Now Available

NEW FROM ROUTLEDGE 2026

'Capital' as Literature: Marx Against Himself



’CAPITAL’ AS LITERATURE: MARX AGAINST HIMSELF



Studies of Marx, particularly of his masterwork Capital (1867), are as a rule tutelary—they attempt to explain him. Even literary readers of Marx, from Raymond Williams to Fredric Jameson, seek to secure Marxist tenets by means of Marxian style. ‘Capital’ as Literature: Marx Against Himself departs from this tradition by reading Capital as literary in its own right rather than as political economy with style as its filigree rather than its focus. Here, Marx emerges in a different light. If literature is writing that calls whatever is settled into question, then Marx's writing is literature, not because of its revolutionary program, but because Marx's rhetoric, particularly its key trope of chiasmus, undoes the coherence of the notions it propounds, especially in Capital. Marx's chiasmatic style turns Capital into a mise en abyme and Marx's enterprise into an example of what it describes rather than its foil or antidote: the structure of capital itself. Capital, like capital, is a self-begetting production machine whose fungibility as a form is one and the same with the money economy it unravels. ‘Capital’ as Literature: Marx Against Himself shows how this irony unfolds and what the implications are for epistemology, cultural studies, and literary criticism.




ALSO FROM ROUTLEDGE 2022

Criticism After Theory from Shakespeare to Virginia Woolf



CRITICISM AFTER THEORY FROM SHAKESPEARE TO VIRIGINIA WOOLF

The argument of this book is a simple one: that criticism after theory is a single movement of thought defined by synthesis and continuity rather than by conflict and change. The most influential figures in criticism since Saussure—Bakhtin, Derrida, and Foucault—are wholly consistent with Saussure's foundational Course in General Linguistics (1916) no matter the traditions of complaint that have followed in Saussure's wake from Bakhtin forward. These complaints vitiate—despite themselves and often hilariously so—the misconceptions that have made cottage industries out of quarrels with Saussurean semiology that are based on notions of Saussure that are incorrect. The materialist criticism dominant today is actually dependent upon on the legacy of a presumably formalist structuralism rather than a step beyond it. New Historicism, postcolonialism, gender studies, environmental criticism, archive studies, even shared and surface reading are, like deconstruction, the by-products of Saussure's structuralism, not its foils. Saussure's sign is sensory and concrete. Language and materiality are not distinct but one and the same—history, society, the psychological subject, even the environment are systems of signs, material archives read and reread by futures that produce the past after the fact. Without Saussure, contemporary criticism would have no identifiable or effective source. The book begins with chapters on Saussure and Derrida, Bakhtin and Shakespeare, and Freud and Foucault followed by chapters on Victorian and American fiction, D.H. Lawrence and modern poetry, Virginia Woolf and Melanie Klein, and the historicist tropology of psychoanalysis. It concludes with a coda in life writing on the author's epileptic disability.




Portuguese translation of THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE (Blackwell Manifestos, 2010) now available from Tinta Negra (Rio de Janeiro, 2015)



OS MITOS DA CULTURA POP: DE DANTE A DYLAN


O renomado crítico cultural americano Perry Meisel detona as noções convencionais sobre a divisão entre “alta” e “baixa” cultura.

O autor transita pela provocante teoria de que a cultura pop experimentou ritmos dialéticos. A hábil análise que o livro apresenta de três tradições culturais duradouras – o romance norte-americano, Hollywood, e o rock inglês e americano – nos leva a um ciclo histórico da cultura pop que tem Dante como ponto de partida e revisita ícones como Wahrol, Melville, Hemingway, Twain, Eisenstein, Benjamin, Scorsese e Sinatra.




THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE: FROM DANTE TO DYLAN


The Myth of Popular Culture discusses the dialectic of "highbrow" and "lowbrow" in popular culture through an examination of literature, film, and popular music. With topics ranging from John Keats to John Ford, the book responds to Adorno's theory that popular culture is not dialectical by showing that it is.

Available as eBooks

COURSE IN GENERAL LINGUISTICS. Trans. Wade Baskin. Co-ed. with Haun Saussy. By Ferdinand de Saussure (Columbia University Press, 2011)

THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE: FROM DANTE TO DYLAN
(
Blackwell Manifestos, 2010)

THE LITERARY FREUD (Routledge, 2007)

THE COWBOY AND THE DANDY: CROSSING OVER FROM ROMANTICISM TO ROCK AND ROLL (Oxford University Press, 1998)

FREUD: A COLLECTION OF CRITICAL ESSAYS (Prentice-Hall, 1981)




9/3/10

Albert Collins: Texas Blues Again

by Perry Meisel

The way Albert Collins tore up the Other End last Tuesday night, you'd figure the rugged blues modernist from Texas had all but forgotten the days he drove a truck in Houston for $1.13 an hour. But even though Collins has one of the most formidable underground reputations of any Texas bluesman, he's thinking about getting a truck again as we sit in the dressing room after the gig. At 46, an anxious Collins is talking security as well as blues. Underground reputations, after all, can make you immortal a little too fast, and Collins's career has been as mercurial as the explosive and unpredictable guitar that's made him a gunslinging legend. Back in the '60s, Collins released a series of hit-single instrumentals (songs like "Frosty," "Sno-Cone," "Don't Love Your Cool," and more) that codified his icy, burning sound. In 1968, he moved to L.A. so Canned Heat's Bob Hite could produce and book him, but by 1972 the LPs had stopped even if the gigs did not.
Not that material fluctuations have done anything to erode Collins's passion as a musician. The only real difference between the old hits and his return to recording with the recent Ice Pickin' (on Bruce Iglauer's excellent Chicago Blues label, Alligator) is simply the difference a decade has made in standard recording equipment. Collins is still the same bone-crusher at 46 that he was at 35, a blistering barber of soul with an ax for a razor. And, for the first time on disc, Ice Pickin' gives us Collins the singer, too, a cool and sardonic character whose antic angst used to be reserved for gigs alone.
Although there's nothing especially new about Collins's musical ideas (no riff that's associated with his name like the Albert King shock-stutter, no exact guitar tone like the special sweet one we associate with B.B.), there's a nervy rasp to his playing and singing that makes even Buddy Guy sound staid. The groaning, hissing, buzzing universe on which Collins's amp is a metaphorical window is no Delta dawn or brooding Mississippi, but a raw oilscape of technological power controlled by the bluesman as engineer. Texas also means the feel of rhythm and blues bound rather strictly to the 12-bar grid, with the characteristic groove more a funky thing than the regulation shuffle or slow blues. But no matter the groove, Collins's phrasing is in all cases the exaggerated stutter, the way he falls over backward in that blurting, apparently uncontrolled fashion that gets shaped and stylized in Cornell Dupree or the late King Curtis (both Texans from Fort Worth and both close to Collins in age as well).
That phraseological propensity has a history that suggests in miniature the network of influences at work in the Texas groove as a whole. A principal clue is that Collins plays with his fingers instead of with a pick, phrasing in an almost country style even though his head is full of a swinging rhythm section underneath. The yield of the conflict is the churning funk groove itself, a kind of compromise-formation between country and swing like his hottest new song, "Honey, Hush," the opener on Ice Pickin' and the serene eye of the storm at last week's gig.
The swinging imperatives in Collins's sound can be traced back to the guy usually credited as Collins's principal precursor, the legendary but largely forgotten Texas guitarist Gatemouth Brown. Gatemouth has cowboy airs, and his jumping guitar smokes halfway between Django and the Chuck Berry who had yet to arrive on the scene. Collins's groove is thus a rhythmic structure that can be felt in more than one way. Jazzies can conjure swing riffs when they listen to him; funkophiles can hear Memphis horns; rockers can hear Berry, too, especially when Collins, a la Gatemouth, leans on the fat end of his strings and gets the punctuated drone stylized these days by the Ramones.
To mention the Ramones is not entirely whimsical, since an intentional minimalism seems the only explanation for the rawness of a latter-day bluesman like Collins compared to the relative sophistication of the earlier Gatemouth. For if Collins should be read against the tradition of Texas and the territory jazz bands, what the comparison produces is the recognition that orthodox blues has experienced an ironic kind of chastening or self-curtailment over the years. How else can you explain why Texan latecomers like Collins, King Curtis, or even the Austin rockers are all rawer or simpler than the Bob Wills, the Ben Websters, the Gatemouths? Instead of imperial expansion, development seems to mean contraction and economizing, even though its secret victory is the amalgamation of a series of rhythmic styles in a single-pressured groove.
Or is that called rock and roll?

Originally published in The Village Voice, May 7, 1979

Sample view: