Now Available

NEW FROM ROUTLEDGE 2026

'Capital' as Literature: Marx Against Himself



’CAPITAL’ AS LITERATURE: MARX AGAINST HIMSELF



Studies of Marx, particularly of his masterwork Capital (1867), are as a rule tutelary—they attempt to explain him. Even literary readers of Marx, from Raymond Williams to Fredric Jameson, seek to secure Marxist tenets by means of Marxian style. ‘Capital’ as Literature: Marx Against Himself departs from this tradition by reading Capital as literary in its own right rather than as political economy with style as its filigree rather than its focus. Here, Marx emerges in a different light. If literature is writing that calls whatever is settled into question, then Marx's writing is literature, not because of its revolutionary program, but because Marx's rhetoric, particularly its key trope of chiasmus, undoes the coherence of the notions it propounds, especially in Capital. Marx's chiasmatic style turns Capital into a mise en abyme and Marx's enterprise into an example of what it describes rather than its foil or antidote: the structure of capital itself. Capital, like capital, is a self-begetting production machine whose fungibility as a form is one and the same with the money economy it unravels. ‘Capital’ as Literature: Marx Against Himself shows how this irony unfolds and what the implications are for epistemology, cultural studies, and literary criticism.




ALSO FROM ROUTLEDGE 2022

Criticism After Theory from Shakespeare to Virginia Woolf



CRITICISM AFTER THEORY FROM SHAKESPEARE TO VIRIGINIA WOOLF

The argument of this book is a simple one: that criticism after theory is a single movement of thought defined by synthesis and continuity rather than by conflict and change. The most influential figures in criticism since Saussure—Bakhtin, Derrida, and Foucault—are wholly consistent with Saussure's foundational Course in General Linguistics (1916) no matter the traditions of complaint that have followed in Saussure's wake from Bakhtin forward. These complaints vitiate—despite themselves and often hilariously so—the misconceptions that have made cottage industries out of quarrels with Saussurean semiology that are based on notions of Saussure that are incorrect. The materialist criticism dominant today is actually dependent upon on the legacy of a presumably formalist structuralism rather than a step beyond it. New Historicism, postcolonialism, gender studies, environmental criticism, archive studies, even shared and surface reading are, like deconstruction, the by-products of Saussure's structuralism, not its foils. Saussure's sign is sensory and concrete. Language and materiality are not distinct but one and the same—history, society, the psychological subject, even the environment are systems of signs, material archives read and reread by futures that produce the past after the fact. Without Saussure, contemporary criticism would have no identifiable or effective source. The book begins with chapters on Saussure and Derrida, Bakhtin and Shakespeare, and Freud and Foucault followed by chapters on Victorian and American fiction, D.H. Lawrence and modern poetry, Virginia Woolf and Melanie Klein, and the historicist tropology of psychoanalysis. It concludes with a coda in life writing on the author's epileptic disability.




Portuguese translation of THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE (Blackwell Manifestos, 2010) now available from Tinta Negra (Rio de Janeiro, 2015)



OS MITOS DA CULTURA POP: DE DANTE A DYLAN


O renomado crítico cultural americano Perry Meisel detona as noções convencionais sobre a divisão entre “alta” e “baixa” cultura.

O autor transita pela provocante teoria de que a cultura pop experimentou ritmos dialéticos. A hábil análise que o livro apresenta de três tradições culturais duradouras – o romance norte-americano, Hollywood, e o rock inglês e americano – nos leva a um ciclo histórico da cultura pop que tem Dante como ponto de partida e revisita ícones como Wahrol, Melville, Hemingway, Twain, Eisenstein, Benjamin, Scorsese e Sinatra.




THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE: FROM DANTE TO DYLAN


The Myth of Popular Culture discusses the dialectic of "highbrow" and "lowbrow" in popular culture through an examination of literature, film, and popular music. With topics ranging from John Keats to John Ford, the book responds to Adorno's theory that popular culture is not dialectical by showing that it is.

Available as eBooks

COURSE IN GENERAL LINGUISTICS. Trans. Wade Baskin. Co-ed. with Haun Saussy. By Ferdinand de Saussure (Columbia University Press, 2011)

THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE: FROM DANTE TO DYLAN
(
Blackwell Manifestos, 2010)

THE LITERARY FREUD (Routledge, 2007)

THE COWBOY AND THE DANDY: CROSSING OVER FROM ROMANTICISM TO ROCK AND ROLL (Oxford University Press, 1998)

FREUD: A COLLECTION OF CRITICAL ESSAYS (Prentice-Hall, 1981)




4/6/10

The Band: Moondog Matinee

by Perry Meisel

The temptation to theorize about the Band's homage to roots or its fall into the decadence of nostalgia is strong. But why put more effort into talking about Moondog Matinee than it took to make it? The Band has long been unhappy about completing their contract with Capitol. What easier way of knocking off another album obligation than by tossing together a bunch of old rock 'n' roll tunes? Sure, the music's good, but the fact is that the Band hasn't done anything new since Cahoots, which, like Stage Fright, contained real examples of exhaustion, of repetition. One had the vague sense that all was not as soulful as it had been on those first two astonishing albums.
Now Moondog Matinee appears, devoid of original material but grinning nonetheless. The Band seems somehow pleased with itself, the result more, I think, of having justified inertia than of actual achievement.
The lurid oils of Edward Kasper's cover painting suggest a double-edged image of the Band. There they are, the five of them, hanging out at the Jook Joint in Shit City Iowa, the scene of interminable nights of roadhouse dues long ago. But it's hard to tell whether Kasper's commissioned portrait is an assertion of flesh and blood in the face of dehumanizing stardom or instead a projection of lassitude, of the wish to retreat from the responsibilities of musical maturity and genuine stature.
When the Beatles recorded whole songs that weren't their own, they were very young. It was the time for them to pay homage (within commercial considerations, of course) to Little Richard or Smokey. And yet here's the Band playing the old tunes, hardly forging a sense of continuity though invoking the past all the same. Clearly it's ease and retreat they have in mind, not the development of musical relationships or even a hard look at themselves.
Still, it's easy and fun (if that's also where you're at) to relax and listen to the guys shitkick some rock 'n' roll in their unique way. Chuck Berry's "Promised Land," Fats Domino's "I'm Ready," and Frogman Henry's "Ain't Got No Home" are the album's out-front rockers, the kind of tunes the Band cut its chops on. Garth Hudson, one of the most overestimated rock musicians in the world, turns in a lot of horn on the record, particularly here, and demonstrates why someone who's been playing tenor for just a short time ain't no bonafide blower. Similarly, his organ entrance on "Mystery Train," after a tasty romp by Robertson, deflates all the energy with an intolerably cute set of classical-style interval lines.
"Mystery Train" is the most satisfying cut, cool and deep in Helm, Danko and Robertson's locomotive funk. Robertson's guitar is the one entirely admirable feature of the album, displaying technical development (in his disciplined use of octaves, for example) and a continuing lesson in the powers of restraint. Manuel and Danko's tender crooning imparts a typical Band flavor to the ballads, notably the Sam Cooke tune, Buck Ram's "Great Pretender," and Malone & Bragg's "Share Your Love." But the mood is more one of effect than of feeling, lacking the awesome serenity of "Unfaithful Servant" or "I Shall Be Released." While Manuel and Hudson's keyboard counterpoint elaborates the harmonic possibilities of these songs remarkably, there is still an undercurrent of weariness throughout.

Originally published in The Boston Phoenix, December 25, 1973