Now Available

NEW FROM ROUTLEDGE 2026

'Capital' as Literature: Marx Against Himself



’CAPITAL’ AS LITERATURE: MARX AGAINST HIMSELF



Studies of Marx, particularly of his masterwork Capital (1867), are as a rule tutelary—they attempt to explain him. Even literary readers of Marx, from Raymond Williams to Fredric Jameson, seek to secure Marxist tenets by means of Marxian style. ‘Capital’ as Literature: Marx Against Himself departs from this tradition by reading Capital as literary in its own right rather than as political economy with style as its filigree rather than its focus. Here, Marx emerges in a different light. If literature is writing that calls whatever is settled into question, then Marx's writing is literature, not because of its revolutionary program, but because Marx's rhetoric, particularly its key trope of chiasmus, undoes the coherence of the notions it propounds, especially in Capital. Marx's chiasmatic style turns Capital into a mise en abyme and Marx's enterprise into an example of what it describes rather than its foil or antidote: the structure of capital itself. Capital, like capital, is a self-begetting production machine whose fungibility as a form is one and the same with the money economy it unravels. ‘Capital’ as Literature: Marx Against Himself shows how this irony unfolds and what the implications are for epistemology, cultural studies, and literary criticism.




ALSO FROM ROUTLEDGE 2022

Criticism After Theory from Shakespeare to Virginia Woolf



CRITICISM AFTER THEORY FROM SHAKESPEARE TO VIRIGINIA WOOLF

The argument of this book is a simple one: that criticism after theory is a single movement of thought defined by synthesis and continuity rather than by conflict and change. The most influential figures in criticism since Saussure—Bakhtin, Derrida, and Foucault—are wholly consistent with Saussure's foundational Course in General Linguistics (1916) no matter the traditions of complaint that have followed in Saussure's wake from Bakhtin forward. These complaints vitiate—despite themselves and often hilariously so—the misconceptions that have made cottage industries out of quarrels with Saussurean semiology that are based on notions of Saussure that are incorrect. The materialist criticism dominant today is actually dependent upon on the legacy of a presumably formalist structuralism rather than a step beyond it. New Historicism, postcolonialism, gender studies, environmental criticism, archive studies, even shared and surface reading are, like deconstruction, the by-products of Saussure's structuralism, not its foils. Saussure's sign is sensory and concrete. Language and materiality are not distinct but one and the same—history, society, the psychological subject, even the environment are systems of signs, material archives read and reread by futures that produce the past after the fact. Without Saussure, contemporary criticism would have no identifiable or effective source. The book begins with chapters on Saussure and Derrida, Bakhtin and Shakespeare, and Freud and Foucault followed by chapters on Victorian and American fiction, D.H. Lawrence and modern poetry, Virginia Woolf and Melanie Klein, and the historicist tropology of psychoanalysis. It concludes with a coda in life writing on the author's epileptic disability.




Portuguese translation of THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE (Blackwell Manifestos, 2010) now available from Tinta Negra (Rio de Janeiro, 2015)



OS MITOS DA CULTURA POP: DE DANTE A DYLAN


O renomado crítico cultural americano Perry Meisel detona as noções convencionais sobre a divisão entre “alta” e “baixa” cultura.

O autor transita pela provocante teoria de que a cultura pop experimentou ritmos dialéticos. A hábil análise que o livro apresenta de três tradições culturais duradouras – o romance norte-americano, Hollywood, e o rock inglês e americano – nos leva a um ciclo histórico da cultura pop que tem Dante como ponto de partida e revisita ícones como Wahrol, Melville, Hemingway, Twain, Eisenstein, Benjamin, Scorsese e Sinatra.




THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE: FROM DANTE TO DYLAN


The Myth of Popular Culture discusses the dialectic of "highbrow" and "lowbrow" in popular culture through an examination of literature, film, and popular music. With topics ranging from John Keats to John Ford, the book responds to Adorno's theory that popular culture is not dialectical by showing that it is.

Available as eBooks

COURSE IN GENERAL LINGUISTICS. Trans. Wade Baskin. Co-ed. with Haun Saussy. By Ferdinand de Saussure (Columbia University Press, 2011)

THE MYTH OF POPULAR CULTURE: FROM DANTE TO DYLAN
(
Blackwell Manifestos, 2010)

THE LITERARY FREUD (Routledge, 2007)

THE COWBOY AND THE DANDY: CROSSING OVER FROM ROMANTICISM TO ROCK AND ROLL (Oxford University Press, 1998)

FREUD: A COLLECTION OF CRITICAL ESSAYS (Prentice-Hall, 1981)




6/17/10

Led Zeppelin Throbs With a Vengeance

by Perry Meisel

Led Zeppelin has roused from its slumbers long enough to present its annual self-tribute, and the result ("Presence," on Swan Song) is the band's best disc in years. This is Zep's seventh album since they joined together in a London recording studio back in 1968, and it actually threatens to compare, even more than '71's nameless album, with the exhilarating pretensions of those monuments from the early days: Zep I and II.
"Presence" ranks this high in Zep's oeuvre because the band is relentless here at what it does best. We're spared the tedium of Page's acoustic guitar and Plant's bogus balladeering for the first time in Zep recording history. Instead, we get throbbing riff stuff with a vengeance devoid of ornament of any kind. With more than his usual vindictiveness, Page slows and thickens a pile of (normally) crisp rocking grooves ("To be a rock and not to roll" says the clincher to the poem-notes of "Zoso") and swells them to grotesque proportions by compulsive rhythmic repetitions that translate (as always) to narcissistic self-absorption. The tracks ooze with the grease of these exertions.
There's also a kind of pattern to all this over the course of the album. It thunders from the start, but it widens and contracts its rhythmic ground as the disc unfolds. The sound circles from close columns ("Achilles Last Stand") to massive horizons ("For Your Life") and back again ("Nobody's Fault But Mine"); from slow blues ("Tea for One") and Bo Diddley bounce ("Candy Store Rock," with a trace of Mark Farner in Plant's vocal) to a twangy funk as creamy as its title ("Royal Orleans"). Page orchestrates his riffs, too, leaving the most astounding ones till the penultimacies of the album's later phase ("Nobody's Fault," "Hots on for Nowhere"). Even his multiple guitar tones (count the channels) accede to a kind of dramatic unfurling from radiance to doom in this allegory of rocking forms, where architecture, melody, and colors (rock synesthesia: "Play some more orange, Eric") all constitute repetitions like the ones Page lavishes on his own rhythms.
This formalism stands in sharp contrast to the "humanistic" lust and despair of both the lyrics and the instruments. Sentiments of destruction and violation, after all, don't augur well for the careful structures that contain them. But the dangers posed by this threatened conflict between the band's impersonal craftsmanship and its manifest rage for chaos are neutralized by Page's tactics as a producer. If Plant is human - a standard erotic victim - at the start of the lp ("Is there no mercy in the city of the damned?"), he turns into an alloy of Page's metal by the halfway point ("Nobody's Fault").
Of course, this thematic is so stylized that all the struggle and defeat freezes into purely ritual gesture even before Page the auteur comes out and performs this alchemy on Plant. In fact, this ritualization or (over)formalization tends to empty human content out of the music from the beginning, and substitutes in its place the struts of a gleaming chrome artifact.
So I'd suggest Zep to be the phenoms they are because of a peculiar formal success in relation to rock and roll and rhythm and blues, and not because of commonplace alienation themes or Page's supposed wizardry as a solo guitarist. We tend not to see the submerged rock and roll modalities in Zep as clearly as we ought to. We mistake the pseudo-symphonic pomp of a good deal of English rock as a sign for some authentic relation to classical music. The Wagnerian surface, though, is deceptive, obscuring as it does those primal scenes of prepubescent Lennons and Jaggers fixed by the radio or more likely the phonograph entranced by black American music. The ocean was an aisle of safety for the Pages, Townshends, Lennons, Jaggers, Becks, Mayalls, and Claptons of this world. It made blues and rock and roll something that came out of a plastic box, as safe and contained as English society itself.
Zep's music, then, takes its meaning more from its relation to rock and roll as a repository of gestures, moods, and figures than from the kind of relation to experience itself invoked by American rockers. Zep's musical significations are to be felt in sluggish caricatures of hyperbolic permutations of rock norms reworked the way Sonny Rollins, for example, weighs and magnifies the unspoken assumptions of a conventional rhythmic setting in jazz.
The reason this strategy can work is because Zep has the soulful Bonham on drums. Without a link to the standard rhythm and blues virtues which he provides in the snap of his snare and the cunning hesitations of his phrasing, Zep would be without musical foundation. Like Ringo, Bonham is traditionally dismissed or even ridiculed when both in fact rank among the great Unacknowledged of rock history. You can feel Bonham's funkiness not just in the Roger Hawkins similitudes of the new disc (the snare and tom fills, for example, on "Achilles'" or "Candy Store Rock"), but even as far back as the specially syncopated high-hat on Zeps I or II. From this angle too you can catch the saxophone logic of Page's rhythm guitar - his metal riffmaking, after all, is really a trash play on the stutter of soul horn arrangements and the drones of Phil Spector's walls of sound.
All this and more on "Presence," Zep's best album in years and the best hard rock disc to appear in recent memory.

Originally published in The Village Voice, June 7, 1976

Sample view: